Message152174
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | jcon, kristjan.jonsson, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, paul.moore, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, pv, rupole, skrah, teoliphant, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-01-28.17:29:11 |
| SpamBayes Score | 6.2108693e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1327771617.8904.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1327771158.38.0.886998726481.issue10181@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Nick Coghlan <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Radical suggestion: make it public as collections.simple_ndarray? > > Heh, that's a nice one. :) Well, the question is: does it have a point? Is this ndarray useful outside of any third-party infrastructure such as the APIs offered by numpy? You might answer that we already have array.array but ISTM that array.array is quite useless in general :) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-01-28 17:29:12 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, teoliphant, paul.moore, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, rupole, kristjan.jonsson, vstinner, pv, skrah, jcon, petri.lehtinen |
| 2012-01-28 17:29:12 | pitrou | link | issue10181 messages |
| 2012-01-28 17:29:11 | pitrou | create | |