Message153057
| Author | eli.bendersky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | effbot, eli.bendersky, flox, scoder |
| Date | 2012-02-10.15:43:14 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.0715487e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1328888595.21.0.138106417039.issue13988@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
>> IIRC, there is a well specified way how accelerator modules should be used by Python modules. I recall a lengthy discussion on python-dev (or the py3k list?) back in the old pre-3.0 days, maybe there's even a PEP? If there's a convention, I'll happily follow it. It would be great if someone could dig up the relevant details (I'll try to look for them myself). >> I don't see a compelling enough reason to break imports in existing code by removing the cElementTree module, so we should not do that. Agreed. Perhaps it should just be deprecated? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-02-10 15:43:15 | eli.bendersky | set | recipients: + eli.bendersky, effbot, scoder, flox |
| 2012-02-10 15:43:15 | eli.bendersky | set | messageid: <1328888595.21.0.138106417039.issue13988@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-02-10 15:43:14 | eli.bendersky | link | issue13988 messages |
| 2012-02-10 15:43:14 | eli.bendersky | create | |