Message153175
| Author | eric.araujo |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, effbot, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, flox, python-dev, scoder, tshepang |
| Date | 2012-02-12.05:11:52 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.8115608e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1329023513.16.0.724971090663.issue13988@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> perhaps even mentioning (at least in the 3.2 doc) that in 3.3 it's going > to be done by default. Is that accepted practice? I don’t think we ever do that, and it would be confusing. -1 to mentioning _elementtree, an implementation detail. What I was talking about is cElementTree. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-02-12 05:11:53 | eric.araujo | set | recipients: + eric.araujo, effbot, scoder, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, eli.bendersky, flox, tshepang, python-dev |
| 2012-02-12 05:11:53 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1329023513.16.0.724971090663.issue13988@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-02-12 05:11:52 | eric.araujo | link | issue13988 messages |
| 2012-02-12 05:11:52 | eric.araujo | create | |