Message154917
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Trundle, alex, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-03-05.00:23:02 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00017597896 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1330906744.3434.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1330906449.65.0.985166161939.issue2377@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I don't think that needs to be a gating criteria for the initial commit, though. I think it should, otherwise we will end up in a situation worse than currently (we will have two competing default implementations of import, depending which API you invoke). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-03-05 00:23:03 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, alex, Trundle, eric.snow |
| 2012-03-05 00:23:03 | pitrou | link | issue2377 messages |
| 2012-03-05 00:23:02 | pitrou | create | |