Message155082
| Author | skrah |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, Jim.Jewett, Ramchandra Apte, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, casevh, ced, eric.smith, eric.snow, jjconti, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-03-07.12:29:09 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00010462775 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <20120307122909.GB4311@sleipnir.bytereef.org> |
| In-reply-to | <1331093383.53.0.464429203652.issue7652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Benjamin Peterson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > Speaking of inline, the "inline" keyword will have to go because it's not C89. Do you happen to know a free compiler that builds Python but does not understand "inline"? I'm asking because without testing you can never really be sure: For example I added support for compilers without uint64_t, but all major compilers (gcc, suncc, icc, VS) of course have uint64_t. Then I finally found CompCert, and discovered that a couple of things were missing in the headers. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-03-07 12:29:10 | skrah | set | recipients: + skrah, lemburg, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, casevh, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson, jjconti, ced, Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, eric.snow, Ramchandra Apte, Jim.Jewett |
| 2012-03-07 12:29:10 | skrah | link | issue7652 messages |
| 2012-03-07 12:29:09 | skrah | create | |