Message155083
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, Jim.Jewett, Ramchandra Apte, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, casevh, ced, eric.smith, eric.snow, jjconti, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-03-07.12:43:14 |
| SpamBayes Score | 2.1039801e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1331123950.3435.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <20120307122909.GB4311@sleipnir.bytereef.org> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Do you happen to know a free compiler that builds Python but does not > understand "inline"? I'm asking because without testing you can never > really be sure: You could use Py_LOCAL_INLINE, but most compilers should inline small functions automatically, AFAIK. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-03-07 12:43:14 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, lemburg, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, vstinner, casevh, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson, jjconti, ced, skrah, Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, eric.snow, Ramchandra Apte, Jim.Jewett |
| 2012-03-07 12:43:14 | pitrou | link | issue7652 messages |
| 2012-03-07 12:43:14 | pitrou | create | |