Message155698
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, brian.curtin, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, rnk, tim.golden, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-03-14.00:49:06 |
| SpamBayes Score | 3.148387e-11 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1331686147.58.0.0164619607167.issue9079@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> The new patch, issue9079.diff exposes gettimeofday > as time.gettimeofday() returning (sec, usec) pair. A tuple is not the preferred type for a timestamp: Python uses float and is not going to use something different (the PEP 410 was just rejected). I don't see what we need a new function: there is always time.time(). I'm closing this issue because I consider it as done. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-03-14 00:49:07 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, tim.peters, georg.brandl, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, pitrou, tim.golden, brian.curtin, rnk |
| 2012-03-14 00:49:07 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1331686147.58.0.0164619607167.issue9079@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-03-14 00:49:07 | vstinner | link | issue9079 messages |
| 2012-03-14 00:49:06 | vstinner | create | |