Message155965
| Author | larry |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, gregory.p.smith, larry, pitrou |
| Date | 2012-03-15.21:59:02 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.014126469 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1331848743.02.0.126593840744.issue14328@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
It frankly never occurred to me that you'd want mandatory keyword-only arguments. Implementing them as optional-only was easy; I'm not sure but making them possibly mandatory (or both!) might complicate matters. Is there a use case for 'em? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-03-15 21:59:03 | larry | set | recipients: + larry, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, benjamin.peterson |
| 2012-03-15 21:59:03 | larry | set | messageid: <1331848743.02.0.126593840744.issue14328@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-03-15 21:59:02 | larry | link | issue14328 messages |
| 2012-03-15 21:59:02 | larry | create | |