Message155966
| Author | benjamin.peterson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, gregory.p.smith, larry, pitrou |
| Date | 2012-03-15.22:01:37 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00091203424 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <CAPZV6o_fz+Otzd7dOD1Fyx-XQxOOz0VHfU1jS8Jc3pUj=Q2oGg@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1331848743.02.0.126593840744.issue14328@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
2012/3/15 Larry Hastings <report@bugs.python.org>: > > Larry Hastings <larry@hastings.org> added the comment: > > It frankly never occurred to me that you'd want mandatory keyword-only arguments. Implementing them as optional-only was easy; I'm not sure but making them possibly mandatory (or both!) might complicate matters. > > Is there a use case for 'em? No idea, but at some point we might want them and it parallels the Python interface. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-03-15 22:01:37 | benjamin.peterson | set | recipients: + benjamin.peterson, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, larry |
| 2012-03-15 22:01:37 | benjamin.peterson | link | issue14328 messages |
| 2012-03-15 22:01:37 | benjamin.peterson | create | |