Message156480
| Author | skrah |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, Arfrever, Jim.Jewett, Ramchandra Apte, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, casevh, ced, eric.smith, eric.snow, jjconti, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-03-21.08:03:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.028088948 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <20120321080329.GA5440@sleipnir.bytereef.org> |
| In-reply-to | <1332247769.86.0.118560421518.issue7652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> The best thing might be to use Emax=10**8-1 and Emin=-(10**8-1) throughout. > I don't think many applications depend on having Emax=10**9-1. If they do, > they'll have to use the 64-bit version. 10**6-1 would be another option. The advantage is that it's visually obvious that the default exponents have changed. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-03-21 08:03:31 | skrah | set | recipients: + skrah, lemburg, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, casevh, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson, jjconti, Arfrever, ced, Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, eric.snow, Ramchandra Apte, Jim.Jewett |
| 2012-03-21 08:03:30 | skrah | link | issue7652 messages |
| 2012-03-21 08:03:29 | skrah | create | |