Message156634
| Author | Jim.Jewett |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Jim.Jewett, eric.snow, gvanrossum, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-03-23.05:04:40 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00038898506 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1332479081.3.0.39400386744.issue14386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> The problem is to reject sequence in dictproxy constructor. Why? Just because you can't delegate in quite the same way? A sequence *does* meet the (immutable) Mapping interface; it just won't happen to have any non-integer keys. Or are you worried about IndexError vs KeyError? Personally, I would just document it as returning LookupError, but if you're really worried, you could always catch the IndexError and raise a KeyError from it. > The "PyMapping_Check(dict) && !PyMapping_Check(dict)" I'm not seeing how anything could sanely pass that ... was there a typo when pasting? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-03-23 05:04:41 | Jim.Jewett | set | recipients: + Jim.Jewett, gvanrossum, vstinner, eric.snow |
| 2012-03-23 05:04:41 | Jim.Jewett | set | messageid: <1332479081.3.0.39400386744.issue14386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-03-23 05:04:40 | Jim.Jewett | link | issue14386 messages |
| 2012-03-23 05:04:40 | Jim.Jewett | create | |