Message157847
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | csernazs, jyasskin, kristjan.jonsson, neologix, pitrou |
| Date | 2012-04-09.15:01:44 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1333983705.62.0.724408536439.issue8799@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Condition variables don't guarantee that there won't be any spurious > wakeups What do you mean? The implementation doesn't seem prone to spurious wakeups, and the docs don't say so either. > I've added two generic tests of Condition objects in their "natural > environment" as building blocks for bigger things, a Queue and a Lock. Why would you build a Lock out of a Condition? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-04-09 15:01:45 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, csernazs, kristjan.jonsson, jyasskin, neologix |
| 2012-04-09 15:01:45 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1333983705.62.0.724408536439.issue8799@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-04-09 15:01:45 | pitrou | link | issue8799 messages |
| 2012-04-09 15:01:44 | pitrou | create | |