Message158369
| Author | roger.serwy |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Bruce.Sherwood, asvetlov, mhuster, roger.serwy, taleinat, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2012-04-15.21:22:38 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1334524959.26.0.82967370313.issue8900@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Thanks for your review, Terry. Popping from the end is not an implementation of rule 2. Calling event handlers is separate concept from binding/unbinding event handlers. The "doafterhandler" list contains bind/unbind requests that were made while calling event handlers. The doafterhandler "queue" should be FIFO, not LIFO. Code note 1: The running time of the algorithm is an important consideration. Your last suggestion for using a for-loop looks most appropriate, as you've said. Attached is a revised patch for it. Code note 2: The _ComplexBinder class may need refactoring, but that's a separate issue. I'm willing to review patches for that. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-04-15 21:22:39 | roger.serwy | set | recipients: + roger.serwy, terry.reedy, taleinat, asvetlov, mhuster, Bruce.Sherwood |
| 2012-04-15 21:22:39 | roger.serwy | set | messageid: <1334524959.26.0.82967370313.issue8900@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-04-15 21:22:38 | roger.serwy | link | issue8900 messages |
| 2012-04-15 21:22:38 | roger.serwy | create | |