Message158410
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | TheBiggerGuy, docs@python, pitrou, r.david.murray |
| Date | 2012-04-16.11:34:35 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1334576076.01.0.629107773857.issue14586@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
There wouldn't be serious backward incompatibility. Truncate(0) would still mean the same thing as truncate(size=0). I don't remember if we treat supporting the keyword form when it is doced that as a bug or not, though, so you might be right that it can't be backported. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-04-16 11:34:36 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, pitrou, docs@python, TheBiggerGuy |
| 2012-04-16 11:34:36 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1334576076.01.0.629107773857.issue14586@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-04-16 11:34:35 | r.david.murray | link | issue14586 messages |
| 2012-04-16 11:34:35 | r.david.murray | create | |