Message158494
| Author | TheBiggerGuy |
|---|---|
| Recipients | TheBiggerGuy, docs@python, pitrou, r.david.murray |
| Date | 2012-04-16.19:48:15 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1334605695.74.0.787635944115.issue14586@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
@murray The thing I would be worried at in both supporting truncate(0) and truncate(size=0) would be truncate(0, size=1). This could throw an exception but causes the need for extra sanity checks and introduces ambiguity in the otherwise 'only one way to do something' Python style. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-04-16 19:48:15 | TheBiggerGuy | set | recipients: + TheBiggerGuy, pitrou, r.david.murray, docs@python |
| 2012-04-16 19:48:15 | TheBiggerGuy | set | messageid: <1334605695.74.0.787635944115.issue14586@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-04-16 19:48:15 | TheBiggerGuy | link | issue14586 messages |
| 2012-04-16 19:48:15 | TheBiggerGuy | create | |