Message158661
| Author | lavajoe |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, georg.brandl, lavajoe, r.david.murray |
| Date | 2012-04-18.20:53:43 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1334782424.12.0.702649841399.issue10941@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Ah. I figured that one of the Python devs would be who would review it. Is this the normal path for bugs? Not to question the process, but I find it surprising, since I would think that it would cause a lot of bugs to stall out. Also, I had no idea it was the submitter's responsibility to recruit reviewers. And I am not quite sure how to go about this. I do care about this bug (as it's pretty serious that it returns wrong results), so I am willing to do it. Any wiki page or anything that describes the recruiting process or has more info? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-04-18 20:53:44 | lavajoe | set | recipients: + lavajoe, georg.brandl, belopolsky, r.david.murray |
| 2012-04-18 20:53:44 | lavajoe | set | messageid: <1334782424.12.0.702649841399.issue10941@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-04-18 20:53:43 | lavajoe | link | issue10941 messages |
| 2012-04-18 20:53:43 | lavajoe | create | |