Message159009
| Author | cvrebert |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, Hobson.Lane, Roman.Evstifeev, benjamin.peterson, cvrebert, eric.araujo, ganadist, giampaolo.rodola, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-04-23.12:49:07 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1335185348.36.0.672444948294.issue3177@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
No, it isn't. Changing the `IOError(errno.ENOENT, "...`s to `FileNotFoundError("...`s would half fix it.
The other half, the `OSError(errno.ENOSYS)`s, has a FIXME for what's the right error to raise in that case ("no application associated with files of this type"). I have no idea myself. None of the new PEP 3151 errors apply. Nor did any of the errnos strictly speaking AFAICT; ENOSYS was the closest approximation I could find. Thoughts? Custom error class? Different errno? Something else? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-04-23 12:49:08 | cvrebert | set | recipients: + cvrebert, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, ganadist, Arfrever, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, Roman.Evstifeev, Hobson.Lane |
| 2012-04-23 12:49:08 | cvrebert | set | messageid: <1335185348.36.0.672444948294.issue3177@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-04-23 12:49:07 | cvrebert | link | issue3177 messages |
| 2012-04-23 12:49:07 | cvrebert | create | |