Message159134
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, jcea, loewis, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-04-24.11:53:59 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1335268588.2400.44.camel@raxxla> |
| In-reply-to | <1335266526.6.0.822959979186.issue14654@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I'm -1 on using signed char in the implementation. I completely agree with you, for these and for other not mentioned reasons. So I don't released this patch yesterday, and did not suggest it to accept. I showed him just out of curiosity -- whether the effect is stronger on a 64-bit platform? Although this technique will not be accepted, it sets the bar that can be achieved (if it's worth it). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-04-24 11:54:00 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, loewis, jcea, pitrou, vstinner, Arfrever |
| 2012-04-24 11:53:59 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue14654 messages |
| 2012-04-24 11:53:59 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |