Message160026
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, brett.cannon, christian.heimes, eric.snow, grahamd, gvanrossum, loewis, ncoghlan, neologix, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-05-05.19:21:00 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1336245549.3368.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1336245552.85.0.336438703697.issue9260@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Now, if x and y are executed in separate threads - won't it deadlock? Well, the patch has a deadlock avoidance mechanism, and it includes unit tests for precisely this situation. I cannot promise the algorithm is perfect (although there *are* a bunch of tests), but it looks correct from here. :) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-05-05 19:21:00 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, loewis, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, belopolsky, vstinner, christian.heimes, grahamd, neologix, eric.snow |
| 2012-05-05 19:21:00 | pitrou | link | issue9260 messages |
| 2012-05-05 19:21:00 | pitrou | create | |