Message160671
| Author | eric.araujo |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, akitada, andybuckley, barry, belopolsky, christian.heimes, doko, eric.araujo, ivazquez, jafo, jcea, lemburg, matejcik, pitrou, tarek |
| Date | 2012-05-14.22:14:42 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1337033683.59.0.979416658589.issue1294959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Mar 29, 2011, at 10:12 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > no, it looks for headers and libraries in more directories. But really, this > whole testing for paths is wrong. Just use the compiler to search for headers > and libraries, no need to check these on your own. Do all compilers provide this info, including Windows ones? If so, that would be a nice feature for distutils2. Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (Arfrever) on 2012-05-12 19:00 > I currently think that sys.libdir should be only basename of libdir (e.g. > "lib" or "lib64") to allow to easily use it with something else than sys.prefix. With the new sysconfig module I don’t think we need to clutter sys with another attribute. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-05-14 22:14:43 | eric.araujo | set | recipients: + eric.araujo, lemburg, barry, doko, jafo, jcea, belopolsky, pitrou, christian.heimes, matejcik, tarek, ivazquez, Arfrever, akitada, andybuckley |
| 2012-05-14 22:14:43 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1337033683.59.0.979416658589.issue1294959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-05-14 22:14:43 | eric.araujo | link | issue1294959 messages |
| 2012-05-14 22:14:42 | eric.araujo | create | |