Message161507
| Author | orsenthil |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, orsenthil, python-dev, r.david.murray, zulla |
| Date | 2012-05-24.13:59:22 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1337867963.17.0.452517876462.issue14036@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
This is taken care. I was not really convinced on the need as likely seemed a non issue from "urlparse" standpoint, But still there is no harm in returning valid port as semantically the attribute stands for a port. Thanks! |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-05-24 13:59:23 | orsenthil | set | recipients: + orsenthil, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, python-dev, zulla |
| 2012-05-24 13:59:23 | orsenthil | set | messageid: <1337867963.17.0.452517876462.issue14036@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-05-24 13:59:22 | orsenthil | link | issue14036 messages |
| 2012-05-24 13:59:22 | orsenthil | create | |