Message 161861 - Python tracker

Message161861

Author	runtux
Recipients	barry, ggenellina, ishimoto, jafo, kael, leromarinvit, phahn, r.david.murray, runtux, tkikuchi, tlynn, tony_nelson
Date	2012-05-29.09:03:27
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<20120529090321.GA9377@runtux.com>
In-reply-to	<1338236105.18.0.11634262978.issue1079@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:15:05PM +0000, R. David Murray wrote: > > R. David Murray <rdmurray@bitdance.com> added the comment: > > Ralf, thanks very much for this patch. I'm considering applying it. > Given that the current code breaks on parsing various legitimate > constructs, it seems like the behavior change (preserving whitespace > in the non-EW parts...which IMO is correct) should be an acceptable > tradeoff. > > Could you please submit a contributor agreement? > (http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/) Thanks for considering my patch. I've just sent the agreement. Ralf

Content

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:15:05PM +0000, R. David Murray wrote:
> 
> R. David Murray <rdmurray@bitdance.com> added the comment:
> 
> Ralf, thanks very much for this patch.  I'm considering applying it.
> Given that the current code breaks on parsing various legitimate
> constructs, it seems like the behavior change (preserving whitespace
> in the non-EW parts...which IMO is correct) should be an acceptable
> tradeoff.
> 
> Could you please submit a contributor agreement?
> (http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/)

Thanks for considering my patch.
I've just sent the agreement.

Ralf

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-05-29 09:03:28	runtux	set	recipients: + runtux, barry, jafo, ishimoto, tlynn, ggenellina, tkikuchi, tony_nelson, kael, r.david.murray, leromarinvit, phahn
2012-05-29 09:03:27	runtux	link	issue1079 messages
2012-05-29 09:03:27	runtux	create