Message162702
| Author | kristjan.jonsson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | kristjan.jonsson, loewis, paul.moore, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-06-13.09:44:25 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1339580667.06.0.592392257123.issue15038@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
While I'm confident about the correctness of this implementation (it´s in production use right now) I´d like comments on the architecture. - Are people comfortable with the notion of an include file with an inline implementation of portable condition variables like this? - Martin voiced concerns over having a _future_ compatible implementation in there with Windows 7 support only. I thought it cool to have around, since it strenghtens the "portability" design of the pattern. - Names of types/apis. Am I doing it right? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-06-13 09:44:27 | kristjan.jonsson | set | recipients: + kristjan.jonsson, loewis, paul.moore, pitrou, vstinner |
| 2012-06-13 09:44:27 | kristjan.jonsson | set | messageid: <1339580667.06.0.592392257123.issue15038@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-06-13 09:44:26 | kristjan.jonsson | link | issue15038 messages |
| 2012-06-13 09:44:25 | kristjan.jonsson | create | |