Message162765
| Author | hynek |
|---|---|
| Recipients | arigo, christian.heimes, fijall, hynek, pitrou |
| Date | 2012-06-14.10:02:46 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1339668167.56.0.337598586431.issue15061@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I don’t want to be the killjoy but I find it highly questionable to add a function that is advertised as "secure" while we can't fully grok the complexities at play. If we can't produce a provable secure one, we should scrub the function for good; or at least rename it somehow. Unjustified perceived security is IMHO the worst possible case. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-06-14 10:02:47 | hynek | set | recipients: + hynek, arigo, pitrou, christian.heimes, fijall |
| 2012-06-14 10:02:47 | hynek | set | messageid: <1339668167.56.0.337598586431.issue15061@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-06-14 10:02:47 | hynek | link | issue15061 messages |
| 2012-06-14 10:02:46 | hynek | create | |