Message162846
| Author | loewis |
|---|---|
| Recipients | arigo, christian.heimes, fijall, hynek, loewis, ncoghlan, pitrou |
| Date | 2012-06-15.06:31:58 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <4FDAD6DD.7010102@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to | <1339676785.66.0.148848146387.issue15061@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On 14.06.2012 14:26, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment: > >> It's either secure or it's not. > > I don't think that's true. By that reasoning, Python is not secure so > there's no point in fixing crashes or providing a hashlib module. The proper statement is "It's either time-independent or it's not". This *is* a binary state (I agree that being secure is not a binary state). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-06-15 06:31:59 | loewis | set | recipients: + loewis, arigo, ncoghlan, pitrou, christian.heimes, fijall, hynek |
| 2012-06-15 06:31:59 | loewis | link | issue15061 messages |
| 2012-06-15 06:31:58 | loewis | create | |