Message162882
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, fijall, hynek, loewis, ncoghlan, petri.lehtinen, pitrou |
| Date | 2012-06-15.10:31:56 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1339756132.3399.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1339754422.02.0.747287512063.issue15061@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I could wrap up a quick C implementation if you like. The operator > module is a better place for a total_compare() function. Do you a > agree? I think the function is fine in either hashlib or hmac. Putting it in one of these modules is a hint that it's security-related. On the other hand, linking to it from these modules' documentations is just as fine, if it is put in the operator module. If you make a C implementation, it could also be interesting to cover the pure-ASCII unicode case. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-06-15 10:31:57 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, loewis, ncoghlan, christian.heimes, fijall, petri.lehtinen, hynek |
| 2012-06-15 10:31:56 | pitrou | link | issue15061 messages |
| 2012-06-15 10:31:56 | pitrou | create | |