Message163159
| Author | christian.heimes |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Jon.Oberheide, christian.heimes, fijall, hynek, loewis, ncoghlan, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, python-dev |
| Date | 2012-06-19.13:10:15 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1340111416.71.0.996682452107.issue15061@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I've increased the priority to "release blocker". Reason: We should come to an agreement how to handle the issue. In particular we must not pronounce something as secure that isn't secure. Options: 1) Remove the function. 2) Rename the function to a more sensible name and provide a bytes only implementation. I like the Jon's proposal and suggest timingsafe_compare(). 2b) optionally create a C implementation as it's much easier to check C code for timing issues. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-06-19 13:10:16 | christian.heimes | set | recipients: + christian.heimes, loewis, ncoghlan, pitrou, fijall, python-dev, petri.lehtinen, hynek, Jon.Oberheide |
| 2012-06-19 13:10:16 | christian.heimes | set | messageid: <1340111416.71.0.996682452107.issue15061@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-06-19 13:10:16 | christian.heimes | link | issue15061 messages |
| 2012-06-19 13:10:15 | christian.heimes | create | |