Message163183
| Author | kristjan.jonsson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | kristjan.jonsson, loewis, paul.moore, pitrou, python-dev, sbt, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-06-19.15:51:35 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1340121096.7.0.472507931955.issue15038@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
It's an interesting article Richard, but I don't see how their 2nd attempt solves the probvlem. All it does is block the thread doing the Signal(), not other threads, from stealing the wakeup. I think I know how to fix this correctly, using a separate internal "locking" condition variable. I will make some offline experiments with that, to see if it makes sense, given the added complexity. In the mean time, I will document this issue and add the link to the article you mentioned. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-06-19 15:51:36 | kristjan.jonsson | set | recipients: + kristjan.jonsson, loewis, paul.moore, pitrou, vstinner, python-dev, sbt |
| 2012-06-19 15:51:36 | kristjan.jonsson | set | messageid: <1340121096.7.0.472507931955.issue15038@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-06-19 15:51:36 | kristjan.jonsson | link | issue15038 messages |
| 2012-06-19 15:51:35 | kristjan.jonsson | create | |