Message163193
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Jon.Oberheide, alex, christian.heimes, fijall, hynek, loewis, ncoghlan, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2012-06-19.17:12:57 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1340125776.3361.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1340125708.07.0.882549651272.issue15061@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I'm well aware of the fact that they have different timings. That's > why I argued against including a unicode aware variant of the timing > safe compare function. I would not want to repeat myself, but the compare function can be made safe if it restricts itself to a given kind of unicode string (say, all-ASCII). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-06-19 17:12:58 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, loewis, ncoghlan, christian.heimes, alex, fijall, python-dev, petri.lehtinen, hynek, serhiy.storchaka, Jon.Oberheide |
| 2012-06-19 17:12:58 | pitrou | link | issue15061 messages |
| 2012-06-19 17:12:57 | pitrou | create | |