Message163198
| Author | sbt |
|---|---|
| Recipients | kristjan.jonsson, loewis, paul.moore, pitrou, python-dev, sbt, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-06-19.18:08:53 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1340129334.79.0.81958754259.issue15038@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
1.41 Generic emulations of the pthread_cond_* API using
1.42 earlier Win32 functions can be found on the Web.
1.43 The following read can be edificating (or not):
1.44 http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~schmidt/win32-cv-1.html
1.45 +
1.46 + See also
1.47 */
1.45 and 1.46 should be removed?
Also I would not recommend the win32-cv-1.html page as "edificating" (edifying?). The implementations all either suffer from the same stolen wakeup issue or are broken.*
* win32-cv-1.html assumes that SignalObjectAndWait() is atomic and that PulseEvent() is guaranteed to wake a waiting thread if there is one -- but Microsoft's documentation now admits that both these assumptions are false. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-06-19 18:08:55 | sbt | set | recipients: + sbt, loewis, paul.moore, pitrou, kristjan.jonsson, vstinner, python-dev |
| 2012-06-19 18:08:54 | sbt | set | messageid: <1340129334.79.0.81958754259.issue15038@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-06-19 18:08:54 | sbt | link | issue15038 messages |
| 2012-06-19 18:08:53 | sbt | create | |