Message163464
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, Yury.Selivanov, benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, larry, neologix, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2012-06-22.19:22:52 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1340392973.52.0.894129608243.issue14626@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> > http://bugs.python.org/review/14626/diff/5182/Doc/library/os.rst#newcode1210 > Doc/library/os.rst:1210: using it will raise a > :exc:`NotImplementedError`. > Same as above: would it make sense to ignore the arg if follow_symlinks > is not supported, but the fact is irrelevant because the system doesn't > support symlinks at all? And what if the system supports symlink and doesn't support at-functions, follow_symlinks=False and file is not symlink. Should it be NotImplementedError? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-06-22 19:22:53 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, gvanrossum, larry, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, r.david.murray, neologix, Yury.Selivanov, rosslagerwall |
| 2012-06-22 19:22:53 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1340392973.52.0.894129608243.issue14626@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-06-22 19:22:52 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue14626 messages |
| 2012-06-22 19:22:52 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |