Message165339
| Author | amaury.forgeotdarc |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, Arfrever, Jim.Jewett, Ramchandra Apte, amaury.forgeotdarc, asvetlov, benjamin.peterson, casevh, ced, eric.smith, eric.snow, jjconti, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-07-12.22:17:11 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1342131432.44.0.0396068529873.issue7652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I compared both implementations, and they are the same. I noticed that on line 7537, the call to mpd_qshiftl() may "goto malloc_error;". I think there is a memory leak in this case, "mpd_del(&c)" and 2 others lines are skipped. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-07-12 22:17:12 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | recipients: + amaury.forgeotdarc, lemburg, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, casevh, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson, jjconti, Arfrever, ced, asvetlov, skrah, Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, python-dev, eric.snow, Ramchandra Apte, Jim.Jewett |
| 2012-07-12 22:17:12 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | messageid: <1342131432.44.0.0396068529873.issue7652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-07-12 22:17:11 | amaury.forgeotdarc | link | issue7652 messages |
| 2012-07-12 22:17:11 | amaury.forgeotdarc | create | |