Message166074
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brian.curtin, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, michael.foord, ocean-city, pitrou, r.david.murray, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2012-07-21.21:30:03 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1342906090.19457.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1342905661.91.0.286121759553.issue10652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I wonder if it would be sensible to have test___all__ restore the > state of sys.modules after it runs. Probably not. I don't think we want to debug the consequences of having duplicate modules lying around by way of old references registered here and there. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-07-21 21:30:04 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, ocean-city, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin |
| 2012-07-21 21:30:03 | pitrou | link | issue10652 messages |
| 2012-07-21 21:30:03 | pitrou | create | |