Message166748
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, brett.cannon, eric.snow, georg.brandl, ncoghlan |
| Date | 2012-07-29.11:28:00 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1343561282.05.0.416183541351.issue15486@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
In trying to find a new case that wasn't already covered by the test suite, I found an error which I'm not even sure should be an error. Doesn't 3.2 suppress failures that occur when attempting to implicitly cache the .pyc? Anyway, given the rest of the patch, trimming this traceback will be easy if we decide that's the right thing to do. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-07-29 11:28:02 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, amaury.forgeotdarc, eric.snow |
| 2012-07-29 11:28:02 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1343561282.05.0.416183541351.issue15486@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-07-29 11:28:01 | ncoghlan | link | issue15486 messages |
| 2012-07-29 11:28:01 | ncoghlan | create | |