Message166765
| Author | nedbat |
|---|---|
| Recipients | bkabrda, chris.jerdonek, ncoghlan, nedbat, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2012-07-29.14:38:10 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1343572691.15.0.479985124263.issue14803@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Chris: The real problem is that it isn't the "test suite" that spawns the processes, the tests invoke product code, and the product code spawns Python. So modifying the Python-spawning really means modifying the product code to do something different under coverage, which most developers (rightfully) won't want to do. My preference is not to assume a particular style of spawning subprocesses, since coverage.py tried quite hard to be applicable to any Python project. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-07-29 14:38:11 | nedbat | set | recipients: + nedbat, ncoghlan, pitrou, chris.jerdonek, serhiy.storchaka, bkabrda |
| 2012-07-29 14:38:11 | nedbat | set | messageid: <1343572691.15.0.479985124263.issue14803@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-07-29 14:38:10 | nedbat | link | issue14803 messages |
| 2012-07-29 14:38:10 | nedbat | create | |