Message167302
| Author | skrah |
|---|---|
| Recipients | mark.dickinson, skrah, steven.daprano |
| Date | 2012-08-03.09:24:41 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1343985882.68.0.00781588175816.issue15544@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I think math.isnan('snan') probably should not raise. Decimal('snan').is_nan()
just returns true and I am under the impression that IEEE 754 specifies the
same. I have to admit though that I just consulted Wikipedia for the latter:
"The predicate isNaN(x) determines if a value is a NaN and never signals an
exception, even if x is a signaling NaN." |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-08-03 09:24:42 | skrah | set | recipients: + skrah, mark.dickinson, steven.daprano |
| 2012-08-03 09:24:42 | skrah | set | messageid: <1343985882.68.0.00781588175816.issue15544@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-08-03 09:24:42 | skrah | link | issue15544 messages |
| 2012-08-03 09:24:41 | skrah | create | |