Message167908
| Author | loewis |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, loewis, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, skrah, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-08-10.19:18:07 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <50255E72.4050803@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to | <CAMpsgwbwFuCof17wuiJifP5=taVmq1KCc0C77Fz07SnJuRynDw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Can't we start with something simple (for ptyhon 3.3?), and elaborate > later? Sure: someone would have to make a proposal what exactly that is. IMO, the 3.2 definition *was* simple, but apparently it was considered too simple. So either Stefan gets to define his view of equality, or somebody else needs to make a (specific) counter-proposal. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-08-10 19:18:07 | loewis | set | recipients: + loewis, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, Arfrever, skrah, meador.inge, python-dev |
| 2012-08-10 19:18:07 | loewis | link | issue15573 messages |
| 2012-08-10 19:18:07 | loewis | create | |