Message168235
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Robin.Schreiber, gregory.p.smith, gstein, loewis, pitrou |
| Date | 2012-08-14.19:49:27 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1344973551.3329.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1344973438.7.0.0832940303654.issue15653@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> The last code snipped verifies, that we only dereference the type if > the dealloc function is not being called from inside the > subtype_dealloc function. This is necessary because the > subtype_dealloc function itself contains a decref of the respective > type object. Without this check, we would then end up decrefing the > type too many times. I still don't understand why it is required. You shouldn't have to decref the type at all. Otherwise, it is a bug somewhere in Python (typeobject.c perhaps). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-08-14 19:49:28 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, loewis, gstein, gregory.p.smith, Robin.Schreiber |
| 2012-08-14 19:49:27 | pitrou | link | issue15653 messages |
| 2012-08-14 19:49:27 | pitrou | create | |