Message169636
| Author | skrah |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, Dag.Sverre.Seljebotn, belopolsky, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, loewis, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, scoder, skrah, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-09-01.14:24:21 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1346509461.82.0.800548746043.issue15814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Martin v. L??wis <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > Why be more permissive than necessary? -0 on the committed version; > it should IMO further restrict it to 1D contiguous byte arrays. Does "byte arrays" include 'b' and 'c' or just 'B'? I don't see a reason to allow 'B' but not the others. I'm +-0 on allowing multi-dimensional arrays, but it would be odd to restrict hashing to contiguous arrays: >>> b = b'abcdefhhijkl' >>> m = memoryview(b) >>> b[::-1] b'lkjihhfedcba' >>> bytes(m[::-1]) b'lkjihhfedcba' >>> hash(b[::-1]) == hash(m[::-1]) True My reasoning was: If non-contiguous arrays are allowed (and I think they should be), why not allow multi-dimensional arrays, too? The definition hash(m) == hash(m.tobytes()) is pretty straightforward. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-09-01 14:24:21 | skrah | set | recipients: + skrah, loewis, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, belopolsky, pitrou, scoder, vstinner, christian.heimes, Arfrever, meador.inge, python-dev, Dag.Sverre.Seljebotn |
| 2012-09-01 14:24:21 | skrah | set | messageid: <1346509461.82.0.800548746043.issue15814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-09-01 14:24:21 | skrah | link | issue15814 messages |
| 2012-09-01 14:24:21 | skrah | create | |