Message169643
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Alexander.Belopolsky, Arfrever, Dag.Sverre.Seljebotn, belopolsky, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, loewis, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, scoder, skrah, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-09-01.15:16:23 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1346512605.02.0.62559370697.issue15814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Keep in mind that its OK if hash(m) == hash(m.tobytes()) in some cases where "m != m.tobytes()". The only cases we really need to kill are those that break the hash invariant. I don't like the idea of making the definition of hash more complicated just to rule out cases that aren't actually broken. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-09-01 15:16:45 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, loewis, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, pitrou, scoder, vstinner, christian.heimes, Arfrever, skrah, meador.inge, Alexander.Belopolsky, python-dev, Dag.Sverre.Seljebotn |
| 2012-09-01 15:16:45 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1346512605.02.0.62559370697.issue15814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-09-01 15:16:24 | ncoghlan | link | issue15814 messages |
| 2012-09-01 15:16:23 | ncoghlan | create | |