Message169897
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Jeremy.Hylton, Trundle, alex, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, daniel.urban, dmalcolm, eltoder, eric.snow, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jcon, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, nadeem.vawda, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, santoso.wijaya, techtonik, terry.reedy, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-09-06.00:40:49 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1346892050.33.0.963985103993.issue11549@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Any stdlib AST optimiser would need to be substantially more conservative by default. FYI The test suite of Python 2.7 and 3.3 pass with astoptimizer... except some "minor" (?) failures: * test_math fails for the reason explained above * test_pdb: it looks to be an issue with line number (debuggers don't like optimizers :-)) * test_xml_etree and test_xml_etree_c: reference count of the None singleton The test suite helped me to find bugs in my optimizer :-) I also had to add some hacks (hasattr) for test_ast (test_ast generates invalid AST trees). The configuration should also be adapted for test_peepholer, because CPython peepholer uses a limit of 20 items, whereas astoptimizer uses a limit of 4096 bytes/characters for string by default. All these minor nits are now handled in a specific "cpython_tests" config. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-09-06 00:40:50 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, rhettinger, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, techtonik, nadeem.vawda, benjamin.peterson, alex, Trundle, dmalcolm, meador.inge, daniel.urban, Jeremy.Hylton, santoso.wijaya, eltoder, eric.snow, jcon |
| 2012-09-06 00:40:50 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1346892050.33.0.963985103993.issue11549@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-09-06 00:40:49 | vstinner | link | issue11549 messages |
| 2012-09-06 00:40:49 | vstinner | create | |