Message170019
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, Mark.Shannon, alex, barry, benjamin.peterson, cvrebert, daniel.urban, eric.snow, meador.inge, michael.foord, ncoghlan, python-dev |
| Date | 2012-09-08.00:40:24 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CADiSq7dnMup62p+UMigpbbPd-MCLFnLnmrGaroxKwZTMN7sL+g@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1347037411.68.0.879115974689.issue12370@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Yep. The only name in the new scope would be "__class__". Everything else, including method names, should remain invisible from method bodies. I'm not 100% sure it will work as we want, but that's because I'm not sure if we can avoid causing a semantic change for classes at module scope. I just figure it's worth trying. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-09-08 00:40:26 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, barry, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, alex, michael.foord, cvrebert, meador.inge, daniel.urban, Mark.Shannon, python-dev, eric.snow |
| 2012-09-08 00:40:25 | ncoghlan | link | issue12370 messages |
| 2012-09-08 00:40:24 | ncoghlan | create | |