Message170716
| Author | michael.foord |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Julian, brett.cannon, chris.jerdonek, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, pablomouzo, r.david.murray |
| Date | 2012-09-19.09:32:05 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1348047126.6.0.854690363841.issue11664@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
It maybe that patch.object is a more natural interface to the small sample of people commenting here, in which case great - that's what it's there for. However in common usage patch is used around two orders of magnitude more. I've seen large codebases with hundreds of uses of patch and only a handful of uses of patch.object. To support the *minor* use case and not the major use case in TestCase would be an inanity. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-09-19 09:32:06 | michael.foord | set | recipients: + michael.foord, brett.cannon, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, pablomouzo, daniel.urban, chris.jerdonek, Julian |
| 2012-09-19 09:32:06 | michael.foord | set | messageid: <1348047126.6.0.854690363841.issue11664@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-09-19 09:32:06 | michael.foord | link | issue11664 messages |
| 2012-09-19 09:32:05 | michael.foord | create | |