Message170717
| Author | loewis |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brian.curtin, cmikula, loewis, r.david.murray, tim.golden |
| Date | 2012-09-19.09:32:22 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1348047143.75.0.862929512433.issue15946@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I think it should be possible to add a wait=False parameter to rmtree which makes it block until the directory is gone away. This could be similar to the test.support feature added in #15496. For compatibility, such a flag should default to False, and users need to be aware that this may block "indefinitely". I'd be opposed to specifying a timeout - users who need that can use the non-blocking version, and then loop themselves (or we expose a separate wait function with a timeout). Of course, such a feature could not be added to 2.7. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-09-19 09:32:23 | loewis | set | recipients: + loewis, tim.golden, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, cmikula |
| 2012-09-19 09:32:23 | loewis | set | messageid: <1348047143.75.0.862929512433.issue15946@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-09-19 09:32:23 | loewis | link | issue15946 messages |
| 2012-09-19 09:32:22 | loewis | create | |