Message171519
| Author | chris.jerdonek |
|---|---|
| Recipients | chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, xdegaye |
| Date | 2012-09-28.18:53:00 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1348858381.03.0.456828226138.issue16079@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I thought you were talking about test files.
Oh, I see why you said that then. To find the test files themselves, this logic was used in the patch:
+ fn.startswith(os.path.join('Lib', 'test'))]
Regarding your question for the general case, I'm not sure if there is ever a use case for duplicate method names. Is there? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-09-28 18:53:01 | chris.jerdonek | set | recipients: + chris.jerdonek, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, xdegaye |
| 2012-09-28 18:53:01 | chris.jerdonek | set | messageid: <1348858381.03.0.456828226138.issue16079@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-09-28 18:53:01 | chris.jerdonek | link | issue16079 messages |
| 2012-09-28 18:53:00 | chris.jerdonek | create | |