Message172469
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, ned.deily, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2012-10-09.10:17:09 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1349777830.17.0.483258728907.issue16166@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> If you prefer two macros instead of three then we should name them > PY_IS_LITTLE_ENDIAN and PY_IS_BIG_ENDIAN. Fine with me. Having three macros is pointless complication. > If I understand you correctly than we can't have a configure definition > and need macro magic like brg_endian.h. Replicating the current WORDS_BIGENDIAN logic should be enough. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-10-09 10:17:10 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, christian.heimes, ned.deily, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2012-10-09 10:17:10 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1349777830.17.0.483258728907.issue16166@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-10-09 10:17:10 | pitrou | link | issue16166 messages |
| 2012-10-09 10:17:09 | pitrou | create | |