Message172499
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, christian.heimes, ned.deily, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2012-10-09.18:37:45 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1349807775.3334.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <201210091932.08849.storchaka@gmail.com> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> > Fine with me. Having three macros is pointless complication. > > Don't having two macros for one boolean value pointless complication too? No, since you need only one to get going. Either: #ifdef PY_LITTLE_ENDIAN ... or: #ifdef PY_BIG_ENDIAN ... So this is really a simplification compared to the awkward: #ifdef PY_ENDIAN == BIG_ENDIAN |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-10-09 18:37:45 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, christian.heimes, ned.deily, Arfrever, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2012-10-09 18:37:45 | pitrou | link | issue16166 messages |
| 2012-10-09 18:37:45 | pitrou | create | |