Message172585
| Author | chris.jerdonek |
|---|---|
| Recipients | chris.jerdonek, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, ncoghlan, python-dev, sandro.tosi, taschini, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2012-10-10.15:07:48 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1349881668.68.0.369106241235.issue12947@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Like these that discuss the behavior of the doctest.IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL option (but before doctest directives have been introduced): http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/0d6910bef979/Doc/library/doctest.rst#l543 The key is that you can have options take effect without using directives, so it would be good if people can see examples like that. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-10-10 15:07:48 | chris.jerdonek | set | recipients: + chris.jerdonek, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, sandro.tosi, docs@python, python-dev, taschini |
| 2012-10-10 15:07:48 | chris.jerdonek | set | messageid: <1349881668.68.0.369106241235.issue12947@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-10-10 15:07:48 | chris.jerdonek | link | issue12947 messages |
| 2012-10-10 15:07:48 | chris.jerdonek | create | |