Message174777
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Mark.Shannon, ag6502, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, francismb, ggenellina, ncoghlan, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2012-11-04.10:51:36 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1352026269.3394.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1352021825.95.0.66102577565.issue5765@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Autogenerated code could easily hit the 1000 term limit - if anything, > I'd be inclined to set it *higher* than 4 rather than lower, as > breaking previously working code in a maintenance release is a bad > thing, regardless of our opinion of the sanity of that code. We can simply apply the 1000 limit in Python 3.4 and mark the bug as won't fix in other versions. I don't think adding a scaling factor just to cope with hypothetical silly code is a good thing in the long term. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-11-04 10:51:37 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, ncoghlan, ggenellina, ag6502, benjamin.peterson, Mark.Shannon, francismb, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2012-11-04 10:51:37 | pitrou | link | issue5765 messages |
| 2012-11-04 10:51:36 | pitrou | create | |