Message176454
| Author | ezio.melotti |
|---|---|
| Recipients | docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, petri.lehtinen, rhettinger |
| Date | 2012-11-26.20:41:33 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1353962493.86.0.262542877407.issue15472@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
The line before the second table says "sequence". That could be changed to "iterable". Specifying "it" in parentheses just after "iterable" and use it consistently in the examples could make it clearer. I agree that using [0] and [1] is OK even if not 100% correct though. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-11-26 20:41:33 | ezio.melotti | set | recipients: + ezio.melotti, rhettinger, eric.araujo, docs@python, petri.lehtinen |
| 2012-11-26 20:41:33 | ezio.melotti | set | messageid: <1353962493.86.0.262542877407.issue15472@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-11-26 20:41:33 | ezio.melotti | link | issue15472 messages |
| 2012-11-26 20:41:33 | ezio.melotti | create | |